Thoughts on crystal substitutes
Posted: 25 Nov 2020, 21:46
Hi All,
Construction of my first Paraset replica is going to plan. I've built a wooden box to hold the mains power supply today (my old woodwork teacher would shoot me if he saw it!) and I wound a new receiver coil yesterday. The dip meter tells me it tunes from below 3.5MHz to 11MHz or so. The coil former is only 21.5mm diameter so I used an online solenoid calculator to scale the number of turns.
I've made an adaptor for FT-243 crystals and I have two, on 7.010MHz and 7.025MHz. Some of you might find the following suggestion unforgivable (!) but I'm wondering whether one of the tiny digital oscillators (DDS or PLL) might be used instead of a crystal, plugged into the crystal socket and powered by its own battery. I think the twisted wire around the anode lead would have to be disconnected. Any thoughts on this? When my Paraset is built and working I'll do some experiments.
73,
John 4EDX
Construction of my first Paraset replica is going to plan. I've built a wooden box to hold the mains power supply today (my old woodwork teacher would shoot me if he saw it!) and I wound a new receiver coil yesterday. The dip meter tells me it tunes from below 3.5MHz to 11MHz or so. The coil former is only 21.5mm diameter so I used an online solenoid calculator to scale the number of turns.
I've made an adaptor for FT-243 crystals and I have two, on 7.010MHz and 7.025MHz. Some of you might find the following suggestion unforgivable (!) but I'm wondering whether one of the tiny digital oscillators (DDS or PLL) might be used instead of a crystal, plugged into the crystal socket and powered by its own battery. I think the twisted wire around the anode lead would have to be disconnected. Any thoughts on this? When my Paraset is built and working I'll do some experiments.
73,
John 4EDX